INTEGRA Journal (Integrated Research for Society) implements a rigorous blind peer-review process to ensure the quality, credibility, and academic integrity of every article published. This process is designed to provide a trusted scholarly platform for the dissemination of multidisciplinary research relevant to society.

Characteristics of Peer Review

• Each submitted manuscript is evaluated through a peer review process involving editors and reviewers with relevant academic expertise.
• The journal applies a constructive and objective peer-review approach to support both early-career and established researchers.
• Reviewers are selected based on their scholarly competence and alignment with the manuscript’s subject area.

Evaluation Criteria

• Methodological rigor and compliance with ethical research standards.
• Originality, clarity, and scholarly quality of the manuscript, including empirical, conceptual, and applied studies.
• Theoretical contribution, practical relevance, and potential social impact of the study.
• Relevance to contemporary issues in education, culture, community development, science, technology, health, and religious studies.

Editorial Decision

• The Editor in Chief, Managing Editor, and Associate Editors oversee editorial decisions based on reviewers’ recommendations.
• Decisions are guided by the journal’s mission to strengthen interdisciplinary scholarship and academic dialogue.
• Manuscripts employing quantitative, qualitative, or mixed-method approaches are welcomed.

Commitment to Quality

• The journal is committed to maintaining high standards of academic quality and research ethics.
• The contributions of the editorial board and reviewers are highly valued in ensuring the credibility and relevance of published articles.
• The journal supports scholarly works that offer critical insights and practical solutions to contemporary societal issues.